Contributed by: Cameo Flores

Why multimodality is useful

With increasingly different types of communication used today, we must meet the demand of our society’s diverse communication styles. Mass education systems were founded on a factory model of education, which gives individuals a consistent education for basic factory job functions. Now that society is moving away from factory-based jobs, creative jobs that require a different type of education are in higher demand. Multimodal composition has been designed to accommodate the creative ways of thinking needed in education today. Multimodal communication ranges from visual movement to audio recordings (Mehu, 2014).

Diversifying the writer

Writers who partake in multimodal assignments are shown to be more fluent in a wider range of communication, diversifying how they approach their education. Diversification from multimodal composition include but are not limited to the following areas of academic improvement (Marchetti & Cullen, 2016).

Uses for multimodality

Clarifying thoughts: Using a drawing to convey an idea instead of an essay can help visual learners clarify their thought processes.

Creating an effect: conveying some ideas through images or spoken words can be more effective than writing these ideas down.

Multimodalism is very useful for ELL/ESL individuals because the ways in which we communicate are  diversified through multimodalism, breaking down language and translation barriers.

Multimodal composition allows for more creativity and flexibility for multimodal writers and their compositions (Marchetti & Cullen, 2016).

Increased awareness

References

Cullen, P., & Marchetti, L. (2016). A Multimodal Approach in the Classroom for Creative Learning and Teaching. In CASALC Review: (Psychological and creative approaches to language teaching). Retrieved from https://www.cjv.muni.cz/cs/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/02/cr-11516-marchetti.pdf.

Mehu, M., & van der Maaten, L. (2014). Multimodal integration of dynamic audio–visual cues in the communication of agreement and disagreement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38(4), 569-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919-014-0192-2